The introduction of MOOCS has
captured the imagination and attention of education stakeholders
worldwide. Much has been made of the
enormous uptake of the various offerings available on the EDx and Coursera
platforms (amongst others) and the
potential offered by open
access on-line learning experiences. However, the long-term sustainability of the
MOOC model has also come under scrutiny, with significantly high rates of
participant attrition (up to 93%), highly variable levels of quality and, most
importantly, significant
levels of investment (e.g. Coursera $US65M to date) without any apparent means
of achieving a financial return (Ruth, 2012).
In fact there appears to be a
distinct lack of consideration around how "moving on-line" fits into
University’s broader strategic agenda. Rather, most appear to be engaging in the
space early (we don't know
where we're going but we're on the journey!) with some
expectation of developing a degree of
capability. In the hope perhaps that
when a viable business model does in fact emerge, they will have reduced the
lag-time associated with responding (Magner, 2013).
However, while MOOCS in their
current incarnation have
been underwhelming (bar the hype) both financially and pedagogically they have effectively signalled at least
three important emerging trends in the tertiary sector:
• They have effectively raised awareness
as to the evolving nature of education, the increasing commercial and market
pressures being placed on the tertiary sector and have opened up the idea that
there might be (gasp!) alternate models of tertiary education (see Bokor
2012 for a snapshot of these issues);
• The
"sharks are circling”. The significant amount of private funds
invested in the MOOC space indicate the significant interest from
private investors anticipating a number of opportunities in the tertiary
education space. Investing in MOOCs now helps those interested
in "the business
of education" to learn about our (sometime arcane) world and develop an appropriate business
model that will suit their agenda;
• There is
widespread desire for short term, consumable learning experiences amongst the
general population, particularly for those able to facilitate and support
collaborative learning opportunities
(Chafkin, 2013).
This last point
is particularly important in the context of the QUT Transform project. Trounson (2013) in the Higher Ed. supplement
(27th Nov, p20) reports that the growth of “taster courses” offered by Open Universities Australia
“Open2Study” is over 30% with just short of 20000 students in their fourth cohort.
“We have
found that online learning that focuses on collaboration and co-operation
enhances student’s ability to explore ideas and
knowledge more effectively” (Open2Study GM Jose Herrera)
So.... The sky isn't falling, but the climate is
changing and more importantly, for those organisations that are agile enough a
wealth of opportunities exist. As
Transform fellow Jason Sternberg says “good teaching
is good teaching”. MOOCs have shown that it’s not enough to whack up a video of a smart cookie and
a couple of quizzes for an engaging on-line experience. By effectively adapting to digital delivery
models we can remain competitive
and to continue doing what we do best: educating (not just
certifying). By
default however it does require investment and open thinking around the best way to
respond. As such the Transform teams are
building and growing a model that leverages QUT's existing strengths and capabilities and takes
advantage of the learning gained from observing other institutions’ experiences in
this space over
the last 2 to 3 years. A strong common
theme throughout the process has been the need to develop a learning
architecture that is flexible and responsive to the needs of student
expectations, employer needs, and aligns strongly with the value proposition and
unique capabilities offered by QUT in an increasingly fragmented and diverse
education sector.
Dr Glen Murphy -- Senior
Lecturer, School of Management - QUT Business School /Transformational
Teaching Fellow
Reference List
Bokor, J. (2012) University of the future: a 1000 year industry on the cusp of change. Ernst & Young. http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/University_of_the_future/$FILE/University_of_the_future_2012.pdf (Accessed 17/10/2013)
Chafkin, M. (2013) Udacity’s Sebastian Thrun, Godfather of free online education, changes course. Fast Company, http://www.fastcompany.com/3021473/udacity-sebastian-thrun-uphill-climb. (Accessed 14/11/2013).
Magner, L. (2013) A wider web: Technological developments have spurred rapid industry growth. On-line education in Australia. IBIS World Industry Report X0008, September
Ruth, S. (2012) Can MOOCs and existing e-learning efficiency paradigms help reduce college costs? International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 8(1), 21-32.
Trounson (2013) Appetite growing for ‘taster courses’. The Australian (Higher Education supplement, 27th November, p20.
Bokor, J. (2012) University of the future: a 1000 year industry on the cusp of change. Ernst & Young. http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/University_of_the_future/$FILE/University_of_the_future_2012.pdf (Accessed 17/10/2013)
Chafkin, M. (2013) Udacity’s Sebastian Thrun, Godfather of free online education, changes course. Fast Company, http://www.fastcompany.com/3021473/udacity-sebastian-thrun-uphill-climb. (Accessed 14/11/2013).
Magner, L. (2013) A wider web: Technological developments have spurred rapid industry growth. On-line education in Australia. IBIS World Industry Report X0008, September
Ruth, S. (2012) Can MOOCs and existing e-learning efficiency paradigms help reduce college costs? International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 8(1), 21-32.
Trounson (2013) Appetite growing for ‘taster courses’. The Australian (Higher Education supplement, 27th November, p20.
No comments:
Post a Comment